Home  › News  › Rules and licensing

us regulators take steps to define prediction market rules

federal officials sent new proposals to the white house to clarify oversight on event contracts.

Written by the BettingEdgeHub desk, 2 October 2026

prediction market platforms and state regulators are locked in a major dispute over the future of sports contracts. federal authorities want to determine whether these products count as swaps or illegal forms of wagering. the commodity futures trading commission recently sent two proposals to the white house for formal review.

defining federal oversight

one of the proposals aims to broaden the definition of a swap to include event contracts. the second proposal would explicitly keep casino style products outside of federal jurisdiction. together these actions could clarify which markets the federal government can control. platforms like kalshi and polymarket currently offer a wide range of event and sports contracts.

state authorities strongly oppose federal control and argue that these sites are running unlicensed gambling operations. local officials point out that prediction markets lack proper age limits and clear tax rules. several states have already moved to enforce their own local gambling laws against major operators.

legal battles continue

the legal fight is moving quickly through the courts with potential stops at the supreme court ahead. an appeals court recently allowed ohio and tennessee to enforce sports betting rules against kalshi. legal experts note that one of the new federal proposals might take effect without the usual public comment period. this fast track approach could easily trigger new lawsuits under administrative law.

the outcome of this clash will shape how betting sites and prediction markets operate across the country. operators face a complex future if federal rules and state laws continue to conflict. punters will need to watch how these regulatory decisions affect available markets and platform rules.