Home › News › Rules and licensing
Rules and licensingNinth circuit court ruling deals major blow to prediction markets
A federal appeals court ruled that sports event contracts are traditional wagers rather than financial swaps.
Written by the BettingEdgeHub desk, 7 September 2026
Federal judges issued a unanimous decision on Friday regarding sports event contracts on prediction platforms. The court determined that betting on game outcomes or player performances constitutes standard gambling. This legal setback allows state regulators to enforce traditional gaming laws against these products.
Federal swaps argument rejected
Company lawyers argued that federal oversight through the commodity futures trading commission preempted state rules. The court disagreed with this defense completely. Judges noted that calling a sports wager a financial swap does not change the underlying activity. Risking money on a point spread remains sports betting under the law.
Impact on legal sports betting
The panel highlighted that identical wagers exist on commercial sportsbooks and prediction apps. A customer backing a team by a specific margin faces the same uncertain outcome on any platform. The court stated that substance matters more than clever marketing terms.
Supreme court review likely
Different federal circuits currently hold opposing views on this jurisdictional issue. Another court previously issued a ruling protecting prediction markets in a different region. This direct conflict means the highest court in the nation will likely need to settle the dispute.
What this means for bettors in Nevada
State gambling regulators now have full authority to block these platforms from offering sports contracts within the state. Bettors residing there must stick to licensed sportsbooks for their wagers until federal courts provide a final resolution.
Nevada bettors must rely on traditional sportsbooks because state regulators can now legally block prediction markets.
